Noratanmal Chaurasia v. M.R. Murli the Supreme court has control that misconduct has not been outlined within the Advocates Act, 1966 however misconduct envisages breach of discipline, though it'd not be doable to put down thoroughly on what would represent misconduct and trait that, however, is wide enough to incorporate wrongful omission or commission, whether or not done or omitted to be done by choice or accidentally.
Professional Misconduct by lawyers in India
0 comments:
Post a Comment